Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stmany years peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those mirar el sitio web of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Losing weight discipline are measured because of the Weight-loss Scale of your Eating Perceptions Attempt (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), comprised of 16 comments obtained for the a 6-area level (never ever = 0/always = 5), with high ratings indicating an advanced level away from restrained eating. For the Consume psychometrical characteristics come across Gather et al. (1982). The fresh new texture coefficient for products, the North american country and you can Italian language ones, was of the identical worthy of, an alpha of 0.76.
Weight-loss restraint
Ineffectiveness measure. The fresh new negative affect basis try estimated from Ineffectiveness Measure off the brand new Eating Disorders Directory (EDI) (Gather et al., 1983), that has shown an excellent convergent validity (ineffectiveness/self esteem ) regarding Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Medical group took the weight and you will level measures
Body mass index (BMI). Bmi are computed as the weight in the kilograms split because of the height from inside the rectangular yards (Bmi = kg/m2).
Prior to study range, a great pilot examination of the Silhouettes Level (Contour 1), applied to a sample composed of 20 Mexican college students, was used to evaluate the newest appropriateness of your own figures to help you represent human body versions, so you can corroborate a acceptation away from an unidentified set of silhouettes and a very clear understanding of the fresh new advice (the Italian language category already measured having research within admiration). The outcome presented the Outline Measure is a great otherwise an appropriate means on Mexican sample.
The newest investigators of these two places, at the Mexico Area as well as Hae (standardized) process. The fresh questionnaires was in fact placed on categories of medical and you can nursing youngsters from the North american country and you will German universities. One of the reasons behind brand new ples off students associated with medication is just the notice one (one can possibly imagine) these types of teenagers need to have to the medical profession as well as health problems, causing them to alot more tuned in to problems for example ED. Informed consent was obtained from every studies members. Every contacted people provided to engage. The fresh new particular local integrity committees recognized new low-intrusive process. Elite group translators undertook and you will controlled the fresh interpretation and you will retranslation of instruments.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for